The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
Blog Article
Extra username and password are demanded for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
one hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it really is practical for the Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce an attempt to dispose of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's attained into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it has attained this sort of stage. Read more
Case legislation is specific to your jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For example, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The case addresses A selection of issues which include, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation on the right to life.
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 on the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation involves that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. Should the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its first purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case law by setting a whole new precedent of higher authority. This may occur several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later on the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement of the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were perfectly aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
This article delves into the intricacies with the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to offer an extensive understanding of its implications and practical applications.
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and shell out fixation are certainly not entertainable for that reasons that this sort of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, as well as the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate as a result this petition is dismissed, which entails disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court is not really in a very position to dilate upon these kinds of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain here cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.